Facebook profits rise amid revelations from leaked papers
The company’s latest show of financial strength followed an avalanche of reports on the Facebook Papers — a vast trove of redacted internal documents obtained by a consortium of news organisations, including The Associated Press — as well as Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen‘s Monday testimony to British lawmakers.
Facebook said that its net income grew 17% in the July-September period to $9.19 billion, buoyed by strong advertising revenue. That’s up from $7.85 billion a year earlier. Revenue grew 35% to $29.01 billion. The earnings exceeded analyst expectations. The company’s shares rose 2.5% in after-hours trading after closing up 1% for the day.
“For now, the revenue picture for Facebook looks as good as can be expected,” eMarketer analyst Debra Aho Williamson said. But she predicted more revelations and described the findings so far as “unsettling and stomach-churning”.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg made only a brief mention of what he called the “recent debate around our company”.
Largely repeating statements he made after Haugen’s October 5 testimony before a US Senate subcommittee, he insisted that he welcomes “good faith criticism” but considers the current storm a “coordinated effort” by news organisations to criticise the company based on leaked documents.
Haugen, meanwhile, told a British parliamentary committee Monday that the social media giant stokes online hate and extremism, fails to protect children from harmful content and lacks any incentive to fix the problems, providing momentum for efforts by European governments working on stricter regulation of tech companies.
While her testimony echoed much of what she told the US Senate this month, her in-person appearance drew intense interest from a British parliamentary committee that is much further along in drawing up legislation to rein in the power of social media companies.
Haugen told the committee of UK lawmakers that Facebook Groups amplifies online hate, saying algorithms that prioritise engagement take people with mainstream interests and push them to the extremes.
The former Facebook data scientist said the company could add moderators to prevent groups over a certain size from being used to spread extremist views.
“Unquestionably, it’s making hate worse,” she said.
Haugen said she was “shocked to hear recently that
Facebook wants to double down on the metaverse and that they’re gonna
hire 10,000 engineers in Europe to work on metaverse,” Haugen said, referring to the company’s plans for an immersive online world it believes will be the next big internet trend. “I was like, ‘Wow, do you know what we could have done with safety if we had 10,000 more engineers?'” she said.
Facebook says it wants regulation for tech firms and was glad the UK was leading the way.
“While we have rules against harmful content and publish regular transparency reports, we agree we need regulation for the whole industry so that businesses like ours aren’t making these decisions on our own,” Facebook said on Monday.
It pointed to investing $13 billion (£9.4 billion) on safety and security since 2016 and asserted that it “almost halved” the amount of hate speech over the last three quarters.
Haugen accused Facebook-owned Instagram of failing to keep children under 13 — the minimum user age — from opening accounts, saying it wasn’t doing enough to protect kids from content that, for example, makes them feel bad about their bodies.
“Facebook’s own research describes it as an addict’s narrative. Kids say, ‘this makes me unhappy, I feel like I don’t have the ability to control my usage of it, and I feel like if I left, I’d be ostracised’,” she said.
The company last month
delayed plans for a kids’ version of Instagram, geared toward those under 13, to address concerns about the vulnerability of younger users.
Haugen said she worried it may not be possible to make Instagram safe for a 14-year-old and that “I sincerely doubt it’s possible to make it safe for a 10-year-old”. She also said Facebook’s moderation systems are worse at catching content in languages other than English, and that’s a problem even in the UK because it’s a diverse country.
“Those people are also living in the UK and being fed misinformation that is dangerous, that radicalises people,” Haugen said. “And so language-based coverage is not just a good-for-individuals thing, it’s a national security issue.”
Pressed on whether she believes Facebook is fundamentally evil, Haugen demurred and said, “I can’t see into the hearts of men.” Facebook is not evil, but negligent, she suggested. “It believes in a world of flatness, and it won’t accept the consequences of its actions”, pointing to its mammoth one-level, open-plan corporate office as an embodiment of the philosophy.
It was Haugen’s second appearance before lawmakers after she testified in the US about the danger she says the company poses, from harming children to inciting political violence and fueling misinformation. Haugen cited internal research documents she secretly copied before leaving her job in Facebook’s civic integrity unit.
The documents, which Haugen provided to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, allege Facebook prioritised profits over safety and hid its own research from investors and the public. Some stories based on the files have already been published, exposing internal turmoil after Facebook was blindsided by the January 6 US Capitol riot and how it dithered over curbing divisive content in India. More is to come.
Representatives from Facebook and other social media companies plan to speak to the British committee on Thursday.
UK lawmakers are drafting an online safety bill calling for setting up a regulator that would hold companies to account when it comes to removing harmful or illegal content from their platforms, such as terrorist material or child sex abuse images.
Haugen is scheduled to meet next month with European Union officials in Brussels, where the bloc’s executive commission is updating its digital rulebook to better protect internet users by holding online companies more responsible for illegal or dangerous content.
Under the UK rules, expected to take effect next year, Silicon Valley giants face an ultimate penalty of up to 10% of their global revenue for any violations. The EU is proposing a similar penalty.